P'rn is, as David Amsden says, the “wallpaper” of our lives now. Totally i would say !
She was right about the warning , wrong about the outcome. As she foretold p'ography did breach the wall that separated an adult private activity from the now popular public arena.The world , post internet did become p'ographized. Young men and women are being taught what heavy petting is , how its looks , how it feels and what to expect by simple training to demonstration videos ..... and this i think is having a huge effect on interaction.
No this effect is not making men into raving beasts.. on the contrary its responsible for deadening male libido in relation to real women leading men to see fewer n fewer women as " p'rn - worthy ". Woman mostly worrying that as mere flesh and blood , they can scarcely get their attention.... Do u think so ?
Obviously women will have her own s'xual needs and it would be impossible to compete with a cyber vision of perfection that's well crafted and tailored for consumers. Erotic images have been reflections of substitutes for real n'ked women in the past but now such images of women are just bad p'rn. There was a time when young men wanted to be with n'ked women than the increasing number of women in the market now. Simple love making was considered an art and erotic but now with Internet p'ography women have lowered their own s'xual value and their actual value. 5$ for a night ... cant get any cheaper than cheap. Now one has to offer or suggest a l'sbian scene , the discharge in the face scene , the bond scene and even a g'y lady boy scene just like p'rn stars.
But does all this imagery in the air mean that s'x has been liberated or do we just compare the billion dollar p'rn industry to agribusiness , processed foods etc ? oh well if ones appetite is stimulated and fed by poor quality material it takes more junk to fill it up. I think people are apart because of p'rn and not turned on in their daily lives but less. Finding each other again e'otically , face to face would be to turn off p'rn ... i don't mean the moral way but in a way that might be more physical and emotional the healthy way. You may want to rethink your constant access the same way you wanted to rethink smoking if you want to be an athlete. * i love my p'rn collection ;) *
Today when i look around s'x is not a mystery anymore :)
PS : This content is compiled from various articles i read before i started this topic ... hope you all enjoy :)
She was right about the warning , wrong about the outcome. As she foretold p'ography did breach the wall that separated an adult private activity from the now popular public arena.The world , post internet did become p'ographized. Young men and women are being taught what heavy petting is , how its looks , how it feels and what to expect by simple training to demonstration videos ..... and this i think is having a huge effect on interaction.
No this effect is not making men into raving beasts.. on the contrary its responsible for deadening male libido in relation to real women leading men to see fewer n fewer women as " p'rn - worthy ". Woman mostly worrying that as mere flesh and blood , they can scarcely get their attention.... Do u think so ?
Obviously women will have her own s'xual needs and it would be impossible to compete with a cyber vision of perfection that's well crafted and tailored for consumers. Erotic images have been reflections of substitutes for real n'ked women in the past but now such images of women are just bad p'rn. There was a time when young men wanted to be with n'ked women than the increasing number of women in the market now. Simple love making was considered an art and erotic but now with Internet p'ography women have lowered their own s'xual value and their actual value. 5$ for a night ... cant get any cheaper than cheap. Now one has to offer or suggest a l'sbian scene , the discharge in the face scene , the bond scene and even a g'y lady boy scene just like p'rn stars.
But does all this imagery in the air mean that s'x has been liberated or do we just compare the billion dollar p'rn industry to agribusiness , processed foods etc ? oh well if ones appetite is stimulated and fed by poor quality material it takes more junk to fill it up. I think people are apart because of p'rn and not turned on in their daily lives but less. Finding each other again e'otically , face to face would be to turn off p'rn ... i don't mean the moral way but in a way that might be more physical and emotional the healthy way. You may want to rethink your constant access the same way you wanted to rethink smoking if you want to be an athlete. * i love my p'rn collection ;) *
Today when i look around s'x is not a mystery anymore :)
PS : This content is compiled from various articles i read before i started this topic ... hope you all enjoy :)
Well written!!, Appreciation of sex in particular women's body has been part of our history,yes! internet has made it as an image of bad pornography which then was a symbol of beauty for the artist
ReplyDelete( let it be the west or east women's body was always considered as a symbol of art and mystery ).
In today's world of dictation ( part of globalization) we are always dictated and expected to behave or perform as the society expects.Hmmm! I guess we have always been doing that - we try to satisfy, please or stay within the social norms and if we take a step beyond that -then i believe we can appreciate everything in life even the so called Bad pornography can be seen as art because then ur looking beyond sex in it.